Skip to content
  • No One Is To Blame: Japanese e-Discovery in a Culture of Harmony

    No One Is To Blame: Japanese e-Discovery in a Culture of Harmony

    Japanese business culture places a high value on harmony, consensus, and collective responsibility. While these principles strengthen workplace relationships, they can create unique challenges during eDiscovery investigations where identifying individual decision-makers is critical. This article explores how concepts such as harmony (和) and saving face influence corporate communications and why cultural fluency is essential when reviewing Japanese documents and uncovering accountability in cross-border matters.

    Read more

  • Analyze This: Evidence in Japanese E-discovery

    Analyze This: Evidence in Japanese E-discovery

    One of the biggest challenges in cases involving Japanese communications is uncovering evidence that’s hidden in plain sight—things that only someone with deep Japanese linguistic and cultural knowledge would catch. In other words, Japanese e-discovery in the legal space requires specialty knowledge to ensure that key evidence is not overlooked.

    Read more

  • Disney’s “Frozen”: How a Japanese Language Translation Illustrates the Critical Importance of Proper Word Selection

    Disney’s “Frozen”: How a Japanese Language Translation Illustrates the Critical Importance of Proper Word Selection

    In Disney’s smash-hit animated film from 2013 “Frozen,” arguably the most iconic scene involves Princess Elsa using her magic to create an ice castle in the mountains while belting out the signature line of the movie…

    Read more

  • Opposing Improper Topics in a 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice

    Opposing Improper Topics in a 30(b)(6) Deposition Notice

    Opposing improper topics in a corporate representative deposition notice is crucial and the process for doing so is unique. Protecting your client from vague, over broad, and burdensome topics is crucial because extensive preparation is required on each topic, and the designated representative’s testimony can bind the organization as a whole. The process for opposing improper topics is unique because, contrary to common practice and understanding, merely serving written objections to the topics is typically insufficient. Instead, the way to preserve such objections is to file a motion for a protective order.

    Read more

Sign Up for Updates